Business & Economics Policy

Reviewers are integral to maintaining the journal’s academic integrity and quality. The editorial team sincerely appreciates their contribution.

1. Confidentiality

All manuscripts are confidential documents. Reviewers must not share or discuss any part of the submission without prior authorization from the Editor-in-Chief.

2. Objectivity and Constructive Feedback

Reviews should be impartial, evidence-based, and respectful. Provide detailed, actionable comments to help authors improve their work, highlighting both strengths and areas for refinement.

3. Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers are encouraged to assess:

           -Relevance to the journal’s aims and scope

           -Originality and contribution to existing literature

           -Soundness of theoretical framework and methodology

           -Accuracy of data analysis and interpretation

           -Logical structure and clarity of exposition

           -Appropriateness of references and presentation quality

4. Recommendations

At the end of the report, select one of the following recommendations:

          a.  Accept as submitted

          b. Accept after minor revision

          c. Major revision required (revise and resubmit)

          d. Reject (with reasons provided)

5. Conflict of Interest

If a reviewer has a personal, academic, or financial conflict with the authors or the topic, they should immediately inform the editorial office.

6. Timeliness

Reviews should typically be completed within 1–2 weeks. Reviewers unable to meet the deadline should inform the editor promptly to allow reassignment.